Skip to content
All articles

Finance

Nasdaq Slides Toward Correction as Chips and Data Centers Get Hit After the Midterms

5 min readBy W. Soares

Nasdaq MarketSite tower in Times Square

Nasdaq fell ~3% on Nov 5 as semis dropped ~7%. Here’s what the chip and data-center selloff means after Democratic midterm wins and AI-buildout scrutiny.

U.S. stocks sold off hard on Thursday, November 5, 2026, with the Nasdaq Composite on course to confirm correction territory. The pressure centered on semiconductors and data-center names—exactly the stocks that powered much of the AI trade—one day after a broad rally tied to Democrats’ sweeping midterm victory.

This is a markets analysis for readers who need the mechanics: what moved, why politics is in the price, and what to watch next. It is not investment advice.

What the tape showed (morning session)

Reuters reporting carried by Yahoo Finance put these levels around 9:57 a.m. ET:

Nasdaq MarketSite tower in Times Square

Image: The Nasdaq Composite slid toward correction territory on November 5, 2026. — ajay_suresh via Wikimedia Commons.jpg), CC BY 2.0

  • Nasdaq Composite: −795.08 points, or −3.09%, to 24,941.44
  • S&P 500: −1.66% to 7,560.88
  • Dow Jones: −0.66% to 53,004.25

Under the surface:

  • A broader semiconductor index was down about 7.1%, with pressure on Nvidia, AMD, Intel, and Marvell
  • Qualcomm slid about 9% after light smartphone-chip outlook / soft handset-chip sales detail
  • Neocloud names CoreWeave and Nebius shed about 9.3% and 13.4% respectively (intraday figures in the Reuters piece)
  • Data-center operators such as IREN, Hut 8, and Applied Digital fell roughly 6% to 11%
  • AI server maker Dell dropped about 10.5%
  • Utilities/equipment names tied to the buildout (including GE Vernova and Constellation Energy) also traded lower

Other outlets describing the same session reported similarly severe chip and neocloud losses and framed the Nasdaq as entering or approaching a formal 10% correction from its recent peak. Intraday percentages move; treat the Reuters morning prints as a verified snapshot, not the official close.

Why “blue wave” talk hit AI infrastructure

Wednesday’s post-election rally reflected relief that political uncertainty had cleared. Thursday’s reverse was more selective: investors focused on whether Democratic control and local backlash slow the AI data-center buildout.

Close-up of an Nvidia GPU chip

Image: Semiconductors like Nvidia's led the selloff, with a chip index down about 7%. — Phiarc via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

Swissquote’s Ipek Ozkardeskaya, quoted by Reuters, argued there is now a chance the prior policy “extra push” for AI infrastructure gets scaled back and that “scrutiny on this aggressive AI buildout” rises.

That narrative overlays a second, company-specific shock: Qualcomm’s results/guidance disappointment, which gave the semiconductor complex a fundamental reason to sell even without politics. CNBC’s coverage of the same session tied chip weakness both to Qualcomm’s forecast and to post-election fears of a data-center slowdown.

Local politics is part of the national tape

The market story is not only Congress. Public opposition to new data centers has been building in key states. When national election results reinforce the idea that pro-buildout measures face headwinds, highly leveraged “AI picks-and-shovels” trades—neoclouds, power-adjacent utilities, smaller DC operators—repriced first.

How to read the move without overfit

1. Correction risk ≠ AI demand disappearing overnight. A Nasdaq correction is a price event. Hyperscaler capex plans can still be large while equities cut multiples on regulatory and permitting risk.

2. Semis are carrying two stories at once. Handset/memory supply issues (visible in Qualcomm commentary elsewhere on Nov 5) are not the same as data-center GPU demand. Index-level selling lumps them together intraday.

3. Wednesday’s rally set up Thursday’s air pocket. Reuters noted the S&P’s biggest one-day percentage gain in three months on Wednesday as uncertainty eased. Fast relief rallies often fade when investors rotate from “gridlock is fine” to “gridlock might slow my favorite capex theme.”

4. Macro calendar still matters. The same Reuters piece flagged Friday’s October non-farm payrolls and a Fed that markets already expected to hike again after September—politics is an overlay, not the only driver.

What practical investors and operators should watch

| Signal | Why it matters | |--------|----------------| | Philadelphia / semis index follow-through | Confirms whether Thursday was a flush or a regime shift | | Permitting / ballot outcomes in big DC states | Converts political narrative into delayed megawatts | | Hyperscaler capex commentary on next earnings | Separates equity fear from booked spend | | Power and interconnection headlines | Utilities sold with DC names; grid is the bottleneck story | | Friday payrolls + Fed path | Can dominate risk appetite even if AI politics stays noisy |

Rows of server racks in a data center

Image: Data-center and neocloud names were among the hardest hit. — Carl Lender from Sunrise, USA via Wikimedia Commons.jpg), CC BY 2.0

Note on sources

A listed Bloomberg video source (BofA’s Cabana on the Fed hiking cycle) could not be retrieved (fetch timed out) while preparing this post. Fed-path comments above rely on the Reuters/Yahoo Finance market wrap instead. Treat any Cabana-specific quotes as [verify] until that clip is reviewed.

Conclusion

The Nov 5 slide put the Nasdaq on a correction path as chips and data-center proxies absorbed both a Qualcomm-led semis hit and a political repricing of the AI buildout after Democratic midterm gains. The useful takeaway for readers is diagnostic: separate handset/semiconductor fundamentals, data-center permitting politics, and macro (payrolls/Fed) instead of treating “AI trade broken” as a single switch.

Takeaway: Thursday’s selloff prices higher scrutiny of AI infrastructure—not an automatic end to AI demand. Watch semis breadth, DC permitting, and Friday’s payrolls before drawing a durable regime conclusion.

Sources

By W. Soares

Educational content only. Nothing here is investment advice.

Keep reading